Are we sure that that the Consortium Plan, as an update version of the Description of Work (Annex I) established by the Consortium, will be accepted by the E..C. for the project reviews, instead of the last version of the Annex I itself ?

If so, is there a process for the validation of any Consortium Plan amendment?

 A Coordinator is worried to find himself in meetings of the General Assembly not reaching the 2/3 quorum of members (DESCA 6.2.3) and thus unable to deliberate validly, with all present parties incurring travel costs for nothing.
What about a member that is neither present nor represented at the meeting becomes irrelevant for the quorum?

The generally agreed standards for project management (and certfication of project leaders) - PMP in the US and IPMA internationally - use the well-known Project Management Body-of-Knowledge (PMbok). Please refer to PMbok for more information. A Google search will also quickly show you the relative popularity of the terminologies, with Project Management Team an overwhelming winner.

Suggestion: change - quickly - the DESCA template to use Project Management Team instead of the confusing Management Support Team terminology.

P.S.
This feedback system is rather difficult to use. A simple form that emails the feedback to an email address would be better.
D.S.

This is a test post to force the categories to appear in the left-hand menu.